Find Famous People Fast!

Browse Bios:

Who2 Editorial Blog

Notes and Commentary from the Editors

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

How Old is Fidel Castro Really?

Fidel Castro, like America's own founding father Alexander Hamilton, has always been coy about his age.

The official line from the Cuban government is clear: Castro was born on 13 August 1926.

But some scholars believe that Castro was really born in 1927. Peter G. Bourne suggests in his 1986 book Fidel, for instance, that Castro's birth certificate was changed by Fidel's parents when he was a child, so that the boy could be enrolled in school a year early.

Cuba scholar Dr. Brian Latell is also convinced Castro was born in 1927. He discusses his reasons at length in this 2007 edition of his newsletter The Latell Report. Latell is swayed by comments made by Castro's family ("On different occasions in the late 1950's Fidel's mother Lina Ruz and three of his sisters publicly confirmed the 1927 date") and by Castro himself ("I am the age that the documents indicate. If they say I am fifty, I am fifty.")

However, Castro gives the year as 1926 in his 1998 autobiography Fidel: My Early Years. He adds: "I was 26 when I began the armed struggle, and I was born on the 13th, which is half of 26... Now that I think of it, there may be something mystical about the number 26."

That sounds like it might almost be a wink at the truth. But because Castro himself gives the date as 1926, and because it is the date on his birth certificate, we're sticking with that date in our own profile of Castro. (We gave Hamilton the benefit of the doubt, too.)

But yes, the date has its critics.

Labels: , ,

Saturday, September 17, 2005

Hamilton's Birth Date

Our friendly partners at Answers.com asked us for a clarification on the birthdate of Alexander Hamilton. We say 1757, some sources say 1755.

There's a controversy over Hamilton's age that goes back at least five decades. We found it discussed at length in volume one of Broadus Mitchell's biography Alexander Hamilton, which was published in 1957; other biographies since then also devote some brainpower to the issue.

Hamilton himself named his year of birth as 1757 consistently throughout his life, and it's the date on his grave in New York City. However, he was an illegitimate child, born in the West Indies, and no birth certificate or christening records exist.

The modern controversy comes from probate court records from 1768, the year that Hamilton's mother died on St. Croix. As part of the probate proceedings, her relative Peter Lytton (Broadus calls him "one of the most responsible men on the island") stated that Alexander and his brother James were 13 and 15, respectively. Thus, counting backwards, one can conclude that the boys were born in 1753 and 1755.

Broadus finds this convincing, but not all scholars do. Presumably Lytton had no reason to lie about it, and presumably he was in a position to know the boys' ages... but on the other hand, maybe he had and wasn't. The circumstances of the boys' birth were pretty convoluted: their mother had walked out on her neer-do-well husband in 1750 but he didn't file for divorce until the end of the decade, by which time she'd had two boys by another neer-do-well, Hamilton's father (who later walked out on *them*). Between the complications, the confusion, and the taint of illegitimacy, it's possible that Lytton didn't have (or didn't give) the right figures. (As a sidelight, Lytton committed suicide the next year -- it was a complicated childhood for poor Hamilton in any case.)

Everyone seems to agree that Alexander Hamilton got a charge out of presenting himself as a prodigy, and those who lean toward 1755 count that as one more reason to doubt him on 1757.

Our view is that long-established dates shouldn't be altered without rock-solid proof to the contrary. Though we find the probate records and the statement of Peter Lytton to be intriguing, we're sticking with 1757 as his year of birth.

Besides the Broadus biography, you can get more information on the topic from Odd Destiny: The Life of Alexander Hamilton (1982, Macmillan, by Marie Hecht) and Alexander Hamilton: A Life (2003, HarperCollins, by Willard Sterne Randall). Hecht leans toward 1757 and Sterne comes out flatly for 1755. Sterne has great detail on the death of Hamilton's mother and the arrival of the probate officers. Curiously, he also apes Broadus's description of Peter Lytton word for word: "One of the most responsible men on the island."

Labels: ,

See all blog posts from: